Do the responsive -cell clusters remain robustly responsive in their gene expression patterns with more prolonged feeding? Do the less responsive clusters become more responsive with time? Are specific clusters more susceptible to apoptosis or dedifferentiation over time? Does the islet isolation process influence mRNA expression? In future studies, applying our annotation and clustering analyses should allow us to address these questions using timed feeding cohorts. identified that distinct -cell clusters downregulate genes associated with the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and upregulate genes associated with insulin secretion, whereas others upregulate genes that impair insulin secretion, cell proliferation, and cell survival. Moreover, all -cell clusters negatively regulate genes associated with immune response activation. Glucagon-producing cells exhibited patterns similar to cells but, again, in clusters containing the minority of cells. Our data indicate that an early transcriptional response in islets to an obesogenic diet reflects an attempt by distinct populations of cells to augment or impair cellular function and/or reduce inflammatory responses as possible harbingers of ensuing insulin resistance. mice fed for one week with either a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% kcal from fat, = 4) or a control low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal from fat, = 3) and used to perform single-cell RNA sequencing. (a) Annotation of islet cell types into different clusters based on Gastrodenol the expression of key identifying genes, depicted in the Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction (UMAP) plots of merged sc-RNAseq profiles from LFD and HFD mice; (b) UMAP of single-cell RNA sequencing profiles from islets of individual mice fed a HFD or a LFD, as indicated; In (cCf), the percentage of cells (c), cells (d), cells (e), and other cell types (f) identified per cluster relative to the total number of cells sequenced is shown. Data are mean SEM, = 3 for LFD and above each bar indicates the average number of cells per cluster. 2.2. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis Reveals Greatest Gene Expression Changes in Minor Cell Clusters Following Short-Term HFD Feeding Next, we examined the gene expression profiles in cells from mice fed either a HFD or LFD for one week. UMAP analysis identified a total of 11 distinct -cell clusters Gastrodenol (1-11, see Figure 1a and Figure 2a). Based on the proportion of cells per cluster (Figure 1c), we identified three major clusters of cells (1C3) and eight minor clusters (4C11). Differential gene expression between HFD and LFD were interrogated, and statistical significance was determined by using edgeR on the integrated single-cell data obtained by the R package Seurat (see Section 4). It is notable that the major clusters of cells (1C3) showed minimal change in gene expression patterns (Supplementary Figure S2), whereas the greatest changes were observed in the minor clusters (most notably 5, 7, 8, 10, 11) (Figure 2b). These findings suggest that minor -cell clusters drive the earliest responses to HFD, and further emphasize how bulk RNA sequencing might miss these sentinel changes. In these minor clusters, the most notable gene Gastrodenol expression changes reflect upon hormone secretion and intracellular inflammatory pathways. Clusters 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11 demonstrated significant in genes that promote insulin secretion (genes, in this group of clusters following HFD feeding. Open in a separate window Figure 2 Identification of differentially expressed genes of the minor Gastrodenol -cell clusters. -cell clusters were identified from dissociated islets from male mice fed for one week with either a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% kcal from fat) or a control low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal from fat). (a) Representative UMAP plot of -cell clusters identified by single-cell RNA sequencing; (b) heatmaps of the minor -cell clusters of genes significantly differentially expressed ( 0.05) in the -cell clusters 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11; genes are ordered from most positive to most negative fold-change. Among the -cell clusters that showed minimal gene expression changes between HFD and LFD, four of them (1, 2, 6, and 9) showed downregulation of genes for the Rabbit polyclonal to PIWIL2 endoplasmic reticulum stress response (and mice fed for one week with either a high-fat diet (HFD, 60% kcal from fat) or a control low-fat diet (LFD, 10% kcal from fat). (a) Representative UMAP plot of -cell clusters; (b) heatmaps depicting.
Recent Posts
- Interestingly, 8C11 neutralizes HEV genotype I particularly, however, not the additional genotypes
- The IgG concentration was evaluated using immunoturbidimetry, while IgG subclass levels by the nephelometric method
- Bottom sections: the tiniest equipped SSTI possibility among SSTI situations was 78% and the best SSTI possibility among the handles was 29%, teaching an obvious separation from the equipped infection status based on the measured IgG amounts
- This antibody property could also offer an explanation for the actual fact the fact that HspB5L-P44 had not been seen in previous studies
- Significance relative to placebo\treated group was tested with the MannCWhitney and and showed no signs of a superagonistic effect 15, 37
Recent Comments
Archives
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
Categories
- Orexin Receptors
- Orexin, Non-Selective
- Orexin1 Receptors
- ORL1 Receptors
- Ornithine Decarboxylase
- Orphan 7-TM Receptors
- Orphan 7-Transmembrane Receptors
- Orphan G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
- Orphan GPCRs
- OT Receptors
- Other Acetylcholine
- Other Adenosine
- Other Apoptosis
- Other ATPases
- Other Calcium Channels
- Other Cannabinoids
- Other Channel Modulators
- Other Dehydrogenases
- Other Hydrolases
- Other Ion Pumps/Transporters
- Other Kinases
- Other MAPK
- Other Nitric Oxide
- Other Nuclear Receptors
- Other Oxygenases/Oxidases
- Other Peptide Receptors
- Other Pharmacology
- Other Product Types
- Other Proteases
- Other RTKs
- Other Synthases/Synthetases
- Other Tachykinin
- Other Transcription Factors
- Other Transferases
- Other Wnt Signaling
- OX1 Receptors
- OXE Receptors
- Oxidative Phosphorylation
- Oxoeicosanoid receptors
- Oxygenases/Oxidases
- Oxytocin Receptors
- P-Glycoprotein
- P-Selectin
- P-Type ATPase
- P-Type Calcium Channels
- p14ARF
- p160ROCK
- P2X Receptors
- P2Y Receptors
- p38 MAPK
- p53
- p56lck
- p60c-src
- p70 S6K
- p75
- p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase
- PAC1 Receptors
- PACAP Receptors
- PAF Receptors
- PAO
- PAR Receptors
- Parathyroid Hormone Receptors
- PARP
- PC-PLC
- PDE
- PDGFR
- PDK1
- PDPK1
- Peptide Receptor, Other
- Peptide Receptors
- Peroxisome-Proliferating Receptors
- PGF
- PGI2
- Phosphatases
- Phosphodiesterases
- Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase
- Phosphoinositide-Specific Phospholipase C
- Phospholipase A
- Phospholipase C
- Phospholipases
- Phosphorylases
- Photolysis
- PI 3-Kinase
- PI 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling
- PI-PLC
- PI3K
- Pim Kinase
- Pim-1
- PIP2
- Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Peptide Receptors
- PKA
- PKB
- PKC
- PKD
- PKG
- PKM
- PKMTs
- PLA
- Plasmin
- Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptors
- Platelet-Activating Factor (PAF) Receptors
- Uncategorized